đ¨ SAFETY LANE NEWS REPORT đ¨DOT Calls for Public Input on Regulations to Remove or Modify, Following Executive Orders from President Trump
- CellEx Consulting
- May 2
- 3 min read
The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) has issued a formal Request for Information (RFI) calling on the publicâespecially transportation stakeholders, industry professionals, and small business operatorsâto help identify regulations, guidance documents, and reporting requirements that could be modified or repealed in pursuit of regulatory streamlining.
This initiative follows multiple executive orders issued by President Donald J. Trump under his new âDepartment of Government Efficiencyâ (DOGE) initiative, aimed at eliminating government overreach, cutting compliance costs, and enhancing federal accountability.

âď¸ Whatâs Driving This?
Trumpâs new executive orders mandate a massive regulatory rollback, expanding on the 2017 â2-for-1â rule. Agencies are now required to:
Identify and repeal at least 10 existing regulations for every new one proposed (unless prohibited by law).
Ensure net regulatory costs are significantly below zero for the 2025 fiscal year.
Offset any new regulatory cost by eliminating costs from at least 10 existing rules.
The DOTâs RFI, published in the Federal Register, states it is seeking input to ensure its regulations do not "undermine the national interest" and instead promote safety, efficiency, and innovation while reducing unnecessary burdens.
đ§ž What Is the DOT Looking For?
DOT is asking for public comments on seven categories of problematic regulations:
Unconstitutional or legally questionable rules.
Regulations based on unlawful delegation of authority.
Rules built on faulty statutory interpretation.
Policies that lack clear legal backing and affect major societal issues.
Rules imposing significant private-sector costs without justifiable benefits.
Rules that hinder the national interest, including technology, infrastructure, and economic growth.
Regulations that burden small businesses or block entrepreneurship.
In addition, DOT is especially interested in identifying:
Obsolete, unnecessary, or unjustified rules
Requirements that are outdated, duplicative, or no longer sensible
Suggestions for repeal, replacement, or modification
Commenters are encouraged to submit specific examples, cost data, and detailed reasoning behind their recommendations.
đĽ How to Submit Comments
Public feedback is requested by May 5, 2025, and can be submitted in two ways:
Online: Federal eRulemaking Portal
Email: Transportation.RegulatoryInfo@dot.gov (include "Regulatory Reform RFI" in the subject)
đ Why It Matters for Trucking
Truckers, motor carriers, and freight companies have long voiced frustrations over overregulation, inefficient mandates, and compliance costs that donât translate into safer roads. During Trumpâs first term, the FMCSA and the Motor Carrier Safety Advisory Committee (MCSAC) already targeted ineffective rules like:
The 1-5 a.m. restart requirement under HOS (suspended by Congress)
The mandatory filing of no-defect DVIRs
This new phaseârequiring ten repeals for every new ruleâdramatically expands the deregulatory scope.
According to recent Overdrive polling, truckers hope this process will address:
ELD burdens
Truck parking shortages
Issues with visa/work permits for immigrant drivers
đ¨ Industry Engagement Is Key
DOT is emphasizing community inputâfrom drivers to safety managers and fleet owners. This is a rare opportunity to shape the future of transportation policy, remove harmful red tape, and reclaim regulatory common senseâwithout compromising safety.
If youâve ever said, âThis rule makes no senseâ, now is the time to back that up with action.
đ Stay tuned to Safety Lane for updates on regulatory reform efforts, FMCSA developments, and how your feedback is shaping the road ahead.
đ Got a rule you think should be gone? Tell usâwe'll make sure your voice is heard.
Stay informed. Stay compliant. Stay ahead. Safety Lane Magazine & CellEx Consulting Group â Your Trusted Source for Industry Compliance & Safety
Comments